"That they may all be one; even as Thou, Father, art in Me, and I in Thee, that they also may be in Us; that the world may believe that Thou didst send Me." - John 17:21
We are often met with the following questions:
1. Are the Churches of Christ (or Christian churches) any different from other churches?
2. Why do these churches exist?
3. What do they believe?
To answer these questions is the purpose of this tract.
The object of existence is not to add another to the many denominations that are now found. A divided church is contrary to the teaching of Christ and His apostles (I Corinthians 1:10-11; John 17:21).
The world will never be led to Christ as long as sectarian divisions continue to be emphasized. The prayer of Jesus in John 17, the teachings of the apostles, the condition of the world and the desire of hosts of Christians demand the laying aside of the doctrines of men and a return to the church as it was in the days of Christ's apostles.
Hence, our aim is as follows:
1. The restoration of primitive Christianity and consequent union of all the followers of Christ in one body (John 17:21).
2. To exalt Christ above party and His Word above all human creeds.
3. To build a church of Christ without denominational name, man-written creed or other barrier to Christian unity, whose terms of fellowship shall be as broad as the conditions of salvation, and identical with them.
4. To lead sinners to Christ in the clear light of the New Testament teaching.
On nonessentials we admit the largest liberty; on the essentials we appeal to the New Testament. "Where the Bible speaks, we speak; where the Bible is silent, we are silent."
The church was called into existence A.D. 30, on the first Pentecost after the resurrection of Christ. To know of the organization, its doctrines and fruits, read the Acts of the Apostles. For about two hundred years it was true to apostolic teaching. But by the mixing of Jewish teaching and paganistic ideas, and through political intrigue, the church of the beginning was lost. Centuries of ignorance and superstition passed by during which the Catholic Church usurped the place of the church of Christ.
In the early part of the sixteenth century, Martin Luther broke the shackles and gave to the world the open Bible. Later, Calvin advocated the divine sovereignty of God. John Wesley agitated the question of more spirituality in the churches. Around these ideas great denominations sprang into existence. The people were inquiring for the old paths. While all the churches were doing good, had much of the Scripture in their teaching, and possessed good men, they were nonetheless weakened and handicapped because they were divided.
Early in the nineteenth century there was a general unrest among the churches of America. In all denominations could be found those who believed that the followers of Christ should lay aside the traditions of men and go back to the church described in the New Testament. Among this number were Thomas Campbell and his son Alexander, a young man who had studied in the University of Glasgow. Father and son were members of the Seceders branch of the Presbyterian Church. "They aimed to take up things just as the apostles left them, and thus, being disentangled from the embarrassments of intervening ages, stand with evidence on the same ground on which the church stood at the beginning." They aimed, not to start another church, but to call the people back to the church of the New Testament. They were not reformers, but restorers. They held up the Bible, and by its teaching restored the church of Christ and His apostles.
None doubts but what the church described in the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistles is the true church of Christ. To restore that church was the work of Thomas and Alexander Campbell. They began emphasizing this feature of Christian work early in the nineteenth century. Today, the people known simply as Christians number several million. Acting as locally autonomous congregations, they cooperate in establishing new congregations, conducting educational and benevolent institutions, and supporting hundreds of missionaries.
We believe that the Old and New Testaments are both the inspired Word of God, but that the New Testament is the exclusive book of authority. Everything that is necessary for the unconverted to do in order to become a Christian, and everything that is necessary for the Christian to do in order to go to heaven are found in the New Testament.
The old law is nailed to the cross (Colossians 2:14). The Old Testament was for the Jew and the New for the Christian. Many commandments found in the Old Testament are now found in the New; but they are binding upon us, not because they are found in the Old, but because they are re-enacted in the New Covenant.
The Old Testament is the New concealed; the New is the Old revealed. We need the Old to help us understand the New. The books have been written for a definite purpose. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John give us a biography of Jesus. We read these to believe on Him. The Acts of the Apostles is a book of church history in which we see the apostles going forth under the Great Commission preaching the gospel and showing men the way to Christ. It is the book that tells one what to do to put on Christ. The twenty-one Epistles are letters written by inspired men to Christian churches or to Christian individuals instructing them how to grow in grace and to live the Christian life. The book of Revelation pictures the destiny of mankind.
We believe that all human creeds and 'Confessions of Faith' should be abolished. This must be done before unity can be achieved. All human creeds have come out of controversy. We maintain that the Bible alone is sufficient for our rule of faith and practice. We go to the Bible for our authority in church government as well as to learn the plan of salvation. Whatever the Bible commands us to do, those things we do; what the Bible forbids, from those we refrain; where the Bible is silent, there is freedom of opinion.
The divine confession is: "Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God." This is the confession of Christendom. We have no right to ask more than this. Peter made this confession when he said: "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Matthew 16:16). (Read also, Acts 8:36-37; Matthew 10:32; Romans 10:10.)
We teach that Jesus is the Saviour of the world and that to Him all authority is given. He is our Lord, King, Saviour, Advocate, Good Shepherd, the Light, the Truth, the Way.
The only test of Christian fellowship is Christ. Christ is our creed.
The Bible teaches a rational plan of salvation. Do what Jesus and the apostles commanded and you will be saved. The Scriptures do not teach us to look for lights and signs and listen for strange voices, and expect to be picked up bodily. The religion of Jesus Christ is intended for all the people and is made so plain that all the people can understand it. Conversion is simply a change - yes, a change of the heart. The Bible says we think and reason with the heart; that is the intellect (Luke 9:47; Mark 2:8). The Bible says we love and hate with the heart; that is the affections (Matthew 6:19-21). We purpose with the heart; that is the will (II Corinthians 9:7). The Bible says the heart condemns and approves; that is the conscience (I John 3:20-21).
When a man therefore is converted, he is completely changed in intellect, in affections and will. He has done his duty and hence the heart or mind approves of what he has done and his conscience is at ease. Faith changes the way of thinking; repentance his will, and baptism his state; and all combined change his relation toward God, and make him a Christian. A man who hears the gospel, believes on Christ, repents of his sins, confesses Christ, and is baptized into Christ is a Christian. He has met Christ where Christ promised to meet him. He must then continue faithful unto death and he will receive a crown of life.
We believe in the personality of the Holy Spirit. He is not an emotion of sentiment, but a thinking intelligence. He can be grieved, rejected or resisted. He is the third person of the Godhead. In conversion, the Holy Spirit operates through the Word of God. He has told us what to do to be saved. God has ordained that the gospel is the power of God unto salvation.
The Bible teaches that the children of God should be known simply as Christians. Luke says: "The disciples were first called Christians in Antioch" (Acts 11:26).
Peter says: "But if anyone suffers as a Christian, let him not feel ashamed, but in that name let him glorify God" (I Peter 4:16).
Paul says that party names are wrong. (Read I Corinthians 1:12-13.) Martin Luther said, "Do not call yourselves Lutherans, but Christians." Wesley said: "I would to God all party names were forgotten." We desire to be called simply Christians, not the only Christians, but Christians only. This is the only name all believers can accept, and it is Scriptural.
Baptism is a positive command. On the authority, subject, action and design, the Scripture is plain. Read and be convinced.
We do not believe baptism is any more important than faith, repentance, or good works. Neither do we believe there is any virtue in the water. But we believe baptism is an act of obedience commanded by Christ in order to receive salvation.
Christ walked about sixty miles to be baptized in Jordan. When He went up straightway out of the water, the Spirit fell upon Him and God said: "This is My beloved Son, in Whom I am well - pleased" (Matthew 3:13-17). Christ commanded the apostles to baptize (Matthew 28:18-20). All through the Acts of the Apostles it is shown that wherever men came to Christ they were always baptized (Acts 2:38; 8:12-38; 9:18; 10:48; 16:15-33; 18:8; 19:5; 22:16). Read Galatians 3:27; Romans 6:3-5; I Peter 3:21; Colossians 2:12.
All believers are subjects for baptism. Christ said, "He who has believed and has been baptized shall be saved; but he who has disbelieved shall be condemned" (Mark 16:16). No person is commanded to be baptized unless he is capable of being taught. We are not aware of any account in the Bible of infants ever being baptized. If any person knows of such a passage he is courteously invited to call our attention to it. Study carefully again the conversions recorded in Acts, as given above, and you will see that the person baptized was always capable of receiving gospel truths.
The nature of baptism makes it impossible for it to apply to infants, inasmuch as it is declared in I Peter 3:21 to be the "appeal to God for a good conscience" and the infant has no conscience in the transaction of infant baptism.
Infant baptism was not introduced until over one hundred years after the death of the last apostle. Therefore it is without Scriptural authority.
The meaning of the word should determine this. The Greeks had, and still have, a word for immerse, one for sprinkle and one for pour. Baptizo means to dip or immerse; rantizo means to sprinkle, and cheo means to pour. This is now the meaning of these words in Greek, and was also the meaning when Christ was on earth. Now, if Christ had desired the disciples to go forth and sprinkle, He would have used the word that meant sprinkle; if He had desired them to pour, He would have used cheo, which meant to pour; if He had commanded them to use water, regardless of any special action, He would have used the word hudraino; but He wanted them to practice immersion, therefore He used the word baptizo.
Paul said in Romans 6:4 and Colossians 2:12 that we are buried with Christ by baptism. Can it be possible that Paul was mistaken in this matter? If baptize means to sprinkle, you can insert the word "sprinkle" in place of "baptize" wherever it is used in the Scriptures, and it will in every case have to make good sense. Try it on Colossians 2:12. It will not work here, because there is no sense in the expression, "buried with Christ in sprinkling." So, as it fails to work in even one case, it must be dropped.
If baptize means to immerse, then we can insert the word "immerse" wherever we find "baptize" and it will not spoil the meaning but make complete sense. Try it on every passage of Scripture in the New Testament relating to baptism and you will find it works everywhere; there is not a single exception.
Let us see what baptism requires and represents in the New Testament. We will then see what immersion and sprinkling require and represent. If we learn that either one requires and represents the same as baptism does, then that must be the meaning of baptize. Be sure to read the following references in this connection:
BAPTISM REQUIRES
Water - Acts 8:36; Acts 10:47
Much water - John 3:23
Going to the water - Acts 8:38; Mark 1:9
Going down into the water - Acts 8:38
Coming up out of the water - Acts 8:39; Matthew 3:16
Form of birth - John 3:5
Form of resurrection - Romans 6:4-5
Form of burial - Colossians 2:12
Form of planting (covered completely) - Romans 6:5
Washing of the body - Hebrews 10:22
IMMERSION REQUIRES
Water - YES
Much water - YES
Going to the water - YES
Going down into the water - YES
Coming up out of the water - YES
Form of birth - YES
Form of resurrection - YES
Form of burial - YES
Form of planting (covered completely) - YES
Washing of the body - YES
SPRINKLING REQUIRES
Water - YES
Much water - NO
Going to the water - NO
Going down into the water - NO
Coming up out of the water - NO
Form of birth - NO
Form of resurrection - NO
Form of burial - NO
Form of planting (covered completely) - NO
Washing of the body - NO
Some ask, "When, where and by whom was the change made from immersion to sprinkling?" The Edinbergh Encyclopedia, in its article on baptism gives the following:
"The first law for sprinkling was obtained in the following manner: Pope Stephen II, being driven from home by Adophus, King of the Lombards, in A.D. 753, fled to Pepin, who a short time before had usurped the crown of France. Whilst he remained there, the monks of Cressy, in Brittany, consulted him whether, in case of necessity, baptism poured on the head of the infant would be lawful. Stephen replied that it would. But, though the truth of the fact be allowed (which, however, some Catholics deny), yet pouring or sprinkling was admitted only in cases of
necessity. It was not till the year 1311 that the legislature, in council held at Ravenna, declared immersion or sprinkling to be indifferent. In Scotland, however, sprinkling was never practiced in ordinary cases till after the Reformation (about the middle of the sixteenth century). From Scotland it made its way into England in the reign of Elizabeth, but was not authorized in the Established Church."
It will be noticed that the change was not made by Christ or the apostles, but it was made by the pope of the Catholic Church.
1. Its Purpose:
The Lord's Supper is a memorial - Jesus said "Do this in remembrance of Me." (Luke 22:19) The Lord's Supper is also a communion - not a communion with one another but with Christ. (I Corinthians 10:16) The Lord's Supper also builds us up in Christ. The more we reverently think of His death for us, the more we are determined to live for Him.
2. Who Can Partake:
Compare I Corinthians 11:23 and I Corinthians 1:1-2. We here learn that Paul says all who call upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Christ gave it to His followers and has never taken it from them. It is the Lord's Table and is spread for His people, and no man, or company of men can rightfully deprive one of God's children from partaking. Closed communion is not Scriptural.
3. How Often We Are to Partake:
From Acts 2:42 we learn that the Lord's Supper had a prominent part in the worship of the early disciples. By comparing Acts 20:7 and I Corinthians 16:1-2, we discover that when the disciples met, it was to partake of the Lord's Supper, and it was their custom to meet every Lord's Day. For the first seven hundred years the ordinance was observed weekly. John Calvin said "the change was a contrivance of the devil." John Wesley advised his people to spread the Table each week.
President Garfield
President James A. Garfield, who lived and died a member of the Christian Church, and was for some years a preacher in the church, was once requested by a lady to formulate a statement which would give her a more definite idea of our position in matters of faith. The following is a copy of Mr. Garfield's statement:
hopedalecoc@windstream.net